How to Write A
Report That Will Be Read - 2/2005

Introduction
Although
this material can apply to any report, it is primarily intended for
reports based on data. This tutorial covers the following topics:
Often
after reading a report, the reader has the
following problems:
- the reader
doesn't know what the recommendations are
- the reader
doesn't know what the conclusions are
- the report style
is often a barrier to having the reader try to read the report
Due to their style, many reports are
not really read, but skimmed - thus "reading" used above means any
activity that the reader chooses.
Don't
believe it? Try the following exercise. Select a report that you have
written and give it to three people. Ask them to read it (often a
challenge in itself). Then, ask everyone to state the recommendations
and conclusions of the report. Do these match what you intended?
There is
sometimes a tendency to forgo writing a report and instead verbally
summarizing the results of a study (almost always "to save time").
The
advantages of writing a report are:
- experience has
shown that written recommendations and conclusions often differ from
verbal recommendations and conclusions
- there is a
different psychology involved between preparing a verbal report
(e.g., largely ephemeral even if minutes are taken) and
preparing something in writing
- documentation:
written recommendations and conclusions will be available if needed
in the future
- legal, GMP, etc.
Definitions:
Data
- Facts and figures
Information
- Knowledge gained from data
The goal
of a good report is to transform data into information or, putting it
another way, have the report do the work - not the reader.
A
prerequisite for a good report is to have a clear goal that is being
addressed. Many problems, including unreadable reports, stem from
unclear goals.
Assuming
that:
- there is a clear
goal
- meaningful data
have been collected to address the goal
then the
task is to transform data into information through
- data analysis
and summaries
- and putting the
information into an easy to read format
Below is
a somewhat extreme example of the difference between data and
information.
These
are data
begin 666
burst1.gif
M1TE&.#EA/``\`+,``"\O_U-3_W%Q_Y"0_[*R_]/3__W]_____P``````````
M`````````````````````"'Y!`$```<`(?X<56QE860@1TE&(%-M87)T4V%V
M97(@5F5R(#(N,``L`````#P`/```!/_PR$FKO<=<H['_X-15(\6%:"J6TED5
MK"I;1D&S=9SILY>3K`+LUL/PA"0;!9GD]5ROH4C9(E`GS.(M9K":K@7O4JJE
MD2<$PJB[%+>R98LPZ#X0*.E2?@.=U<Y=:F@B`W=8=2M.*&&":`-4`QT%A2)[
M7V<?3HPCDX8'D1($CXY7!T*8F7UMC7:CGQT#H*:4;:@@?SJBGIT2`C8&L2VQ
M8)9^ISBZ$[$:OAD"ALE5Q45"5B7`K@3/!\T%S08"LEV%BBF!=9.CX`/<-@,"
M&N]*Z:Q`JA]AA53>H`0!!@'NA#.U;1:M),?\B"(G@5^&@`$/1!0`CZ"K*6GF
ME$F7+>*[9P#_NP2PH>VBJ309G7!8J5(;2#L!`1;R)Y&=/UDG8UD+P>&43RX?
M2?Z+I9.F/T/C=-K*5`UERB4"`K`;\&_2/P!6[W2AJ"].AFI$E7;P-_(=,`"%
MJ'*@*K6>US<+*8831`"`J'`#T,*C^M((2Y9/:KP+0%A-7JZ^!*!=P\BITY_E
M4(P+H%<NO'11`U@FBO+8O51_FJ8):QEOT8R>(]L[A9*H9<)X86S.VU8U:)^.
M'9,YZ^NCXDAD-3_Z#/HO\0S:I*X+6L@N<M]BWY(013B2S+J1N!8H##<L:ML>
M\E&D&[```*GF`=[A>Z5&;HTRW',>&S%@V$@1O87CXM,SSWQ=">-1_P"MX">2
M5BZY90)@/C2&CCRFQ+05-S:-U!!1I<37%":3?$.1'3#!%$\SSS&D84(6+*2$
M-NZ$J%X&$#:D2X8^K&3$0I(,!(X=%9EE4`F-@>>#+AT`4Y$W!)%44#K7A`''
M$RCA08LV!&D53"@'30&?0@_*$HPWT%P4#4)"?H6(*$I@,XLAO$A#XP[@A?;"
M0;P`XPF:E2!B@CE;2C,"GG9BD64@;YKSF9-X"!)(GDTNQ=-GB^:)AB<GE?*'
M=%$`Z48QD7Y1YBU/(BJCIEP<U\.3)W%2SZ5$2/=#%&,$\>:G?IG1'B:O8@K$
B!H"@XJBN9C31*K"/#KLGL<7NBFP1.IBZ[`:ST$9;000`.P``
`
end
The
above data have been converted into information.

In this example, the
'data' have the same content as the 'information' (the data is the
uuencoded gif file, whose alternative representation is shown by the
above figure).
Data
Analysis Tips
(A longer version of this section is covered in actual
training sessions)
Some
suggestions for converting data into information.
Convert
raw data into:
- plots
- tabular
summaries
- other summaries
The
progression is data->information as one goes from the raw data to data
summaries to plots.
Brainstorming about unsummarized data is often appropriate during the
data analysis phase, but "discussing" (e.g., summarizing) raw data at a
meeting because the report does not have summaries, is inefficient.
Use
units that are meaningful to the reader. For example, use concentration
rather than response units and resist the temptation to be esoteric (a
glucose value of 320 mg/dL means more to most than a glucose value of
310 nanoamps).
Focus on
the question being addressed. Example: Is A different than B?
If the
report contains only two columns of results (A and B) then the reader
must perform the subtraction, which is implied by the question is A
different than B. In a better report, this subtraction has already been
done as a third column.
Here is a report format that
highlights information - not data.
1. PURPOSE
2. BACKGROUND/PROTOCOL OUTLINE
3. RECOMMENDATIONS
4. CONCLUSIONS
5. RESULTS
6. DATA
Attributes of this report format
are:
- Within 3-6, and
going from bottom to top
- data are
being transformed into information
- sections get
shorter
- for a
correctly written report, each section is supported by the one
below it
- People know
where the recommendations and conclusions are
- People who only
want to read the recommendations can do so quickly
Descriptions of the report sections:
Purpose
describes why you are writing
the report, i.e., why was the experiment performed.
Background
contains introductory
information about the project and often contains an outline of the
protocol (the full protocol is often appended).
Recommendations
are actions such as:
use 1 mmol/L phosphate (rather than: 1 mmol/L was found to be
optimum, which is a conclusion). The purpose and background sections
should be short enough so that the recommendations start on the first
page.
Conclusions
are a concise summary of
results. Individual recommendations and conclusions should be numbered
and placed in separate paragraphs
Results
are a description of the
assumptions, data analysis methods, theory, etc. Results contain data
summaries, tables, plots This is also a good place to document the
system configuration, i.e., serial number, lot numbers, etc.
Data
are the numbers or inputs to the
experiment. Data can also contain summaries but there should be a trail
to the raw data
|
Symptom
|
Remedy
|
|
People call
and ask " what's the bottom line"
|
Use
recommendations
|
|
You have to
call a meeting to discuss the report
|
Use report
format
|
|
You get no response (because no one has read
it)
|
Use report
format
|
|
You get back
a marked up copy
|
Use proper
English, a spell checker, don't go overboard on fonts
|
Reports for businesses vs.
journals
I was
invited to write a Letter to the Editor about this topic for the journal
Clinical Chemistry. This resulted because during a review of a
manuscript I pointed out a problem that the conclusions were not
supported by the results and suggested that the report format suggested
above might be helpful. The Letter was published (1). However, the
editors decided not to adapt this suggestion.
References
-
Jan
S. Krouwer: Proposal to add an optional Recommendations section to
Clinical Chemistry Abstracts. Clin Chem, 2002;48:2292.
|